4.6 Article

Comparing COVID-19 and influenza: Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcomes and mortality in the ICU

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105600

关键词

COVID-19; Influenza human; Intensive care units; Mortality

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the clinical profiles, care procedures, and mortality outcomes of ICU patients with influenza and COVID-19. Despite differences in clinical presentation and prognostic factors, the mortality rates at 90 days were similar between the two groups after adjusting for confounding factors.
Rationale: Several authors have compared COVID-19 infection with influenza in the ICU.Objective: This study aimed to compare the baseline clinical profiles, care procedures, and mortality outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit, categorized by infection status (Influenza vs. COVID-19).Methods: Retrospective observational study. Data were extracted from the Toulouse University Hospital from March 2014 to March 2021. To compare survival curves, we plotted the survival at Day-90 using the KaplanMeier curve and conducted a log-rank test. Additionally, we performed propensity score matching to adjust for confounding factors between the COVID-19 and influenza groups. Furthermore, we use the CART model for multivariate analysis. Results: The study included 363 patients admitted to the ICU due to severe viral pneumonia: 152 patients (41.9 %) with influenza and 211 patients (58.1 %) with COVID-19. COVID-19 patients exhibited a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, whereas influenza patients had significantly higher severity scores (SOFA: 10 [6-12] vs. 6 [3-9], p<0.01 and SAPS II: 51 [35-67] vs. 37 [29-50], p<0.001). Overall mortality rates were comparable between the two groups (27.6 % (n = 42) in the influenza group vs. 21.8 % (n = 46) in the COVID-19 group, p=NS). Mechanical ventilation was more commonly employed in the influenza group (76.3 % (n = 116) vs. 59.7 % (n = 126), p<0.001); however, COVID-19 patients required longer durations of mechanical ventilation (18 [9-29] days vs. 13 [5-24] days, p<0.006) and longer hospital stays (23 [13-34] days vs. 18.5 [9-34.5] days, p = 0.009). The CART analysis revealed that the use of extra renal replacement therapy was the most influential prognostic factor in the influenza group, while the PaO2/FiO2-PEEP ratio played a significant role in the COVID19 group.Conclusions: Despite differences in clinical presentation and prognostic factors, the mortality rates at 90 days, after adjusting for confounding factors, were similar between COVID-19 and influenza patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据