☆ 4.6 Review

Replication of systematic reviews: is it to the benefit or detriment of methodological quality?

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

相关参考文献

注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Most systematic reviews that used the term updatein title/abstract were not an updated version

Renata Runjic et al.

Summary: This study analyzed whether articles labeled as systematic reviews or meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) were actually updated versions of previously existing SR/MA. The research examined the usage of the term "update" and whether the previous version of SR was referenced. The majority of articles using the term "update" in the title/abstract were not updated versions of an SR.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

添加到收藏夹

Review Dermatology

Overlapping network meta-analyses on psoriasis systemic treatments, an overview: quantity does not make quality

Robin Guelimi et al.

Summary: An overview of 47 redundant network meta-analyses in moderate-to-severe psoriasis treatment revealed low confidence in results, heterogeneous methods, poor reporting, and spin issues. Half of the studies failed to consider important limitations, such as heterogeneity and consistency.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency

Steve McDonald et al.

Summary: This study investigated the completeness and currency of published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 and compared it with a living guidelines approach. The results showed a significant amount of duplication of systematic reviews and a majority of them were already out of date at the time of publication.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The methodological quality was low and conclusions discordant for meta-analyses comparing proximal humerus fracture treatments: a meta-epidemiological study

Nicolai Sandau et al.

Summary: The study investigated the association between methodological quality and reported conclusions of meta-analyses comparing operative with non-operative treatments for proximal humerus fractures. The methodological quality was predominantly critically low, making it impossible to evaluate the association between methodological quality and reported conclusions.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Review Integrative & Complementary Medicine

Reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses of acupuncture for patients with migraine: A methodological investigation with evidence map

Ting-ting Lu et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses on acupuncture for migraine and summarized the evidence on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for migraine. The included meta-analyses indicated that acupuncture was efficacious and safe in preventing and treating migraine. However, the reporting and methodological quality of these meta-analyses need improvement.

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE-JIM (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Review Infectious Diseases

Randomize d controlle d trials in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and critical appraisal

Kavina Kudhail et al.

Summary: This study describes the prevalence of bias risks in randomized trials of therapeutic interventions for COVID-19. The findings suggest that many randomized trials evaluating COVID-19 interventions are at risk of bias, particularly those conducted in low-middle income countries. Biases are mostly due to deviations from intended interventions and partly due to selective reporting of results.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Methodological quality and risk of bias of meta-analyses of pharmacy services: A systematic review

Aline F. Bonetti et al.

Summary: The study found that the quality of meta-analyses on pharmacy services is generally low, with poor reporting on key aspects such as heterogeneity and quality of evidence. Publications in high impact factor journals tend to have higher PRISMA and R-AMSTAR scores, but most studies are still considered high risk of bias. Recommendations for future research are often lacking, and there is little consideration for current guidelines in meta-analyses of pharmacy services.

RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Letter Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Synthesis of systematic reviews of percutaneous device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) for prevention of recurrent cryptogenic stroke: Redundant publications and methodological deficiencies

Mustafa Husaini et al.

Summary: Critical evaluations of systemic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that they are often redundant, lack novel perspectives, have poor methodological quality, and are written by authors with conflicts of interest. This study aims to investigate these issues in relation to percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure for preventing recurrent cryptogenic stroke.

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Hematology

An epidemic of redundant meta-analyses

Celine Chapelle et al.

Summary: This study examined redundant meta-analyses in the same area using the same RCT data. The results showed that multiple studies using the same data led to similar conclusions. To address this issue, the development of living meta-analyses and encouraging authors to update meta-analyses in the same paper as their original research is suggested.

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Methodological quality evaluation of systematic reviews or meta-analysis of trastuzumab-based therapy for breast cancer A systematic review

Hua Wei et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the methodological quality of systematic reviews/meta-analysis on trastuzumab based therapy for breast cancer, showing poor quality in included literature and recommending registration or publishing protocols and reporting following the PRISMA checklist for future research.

MEDICINE (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients-A methodological study

Waldemar Siemens et al.

Summary: This study assessed the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) and the consideration of heterogeneity, finding that the majority of SRs had low quality, mainly due to issues such as non-registration and lack of reporting excluded full-texts. Heterogeneity in trial results was not explored in some SRs, while others considered clinical or methodological heterogeneity, highlighting the importance of improving the quality of future SRs through awareness of quality criteria.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Surgery

High variability in results and methodological quality among overlapping systematic reviews on the same topics in surgery: a meta-epidemiological study

Morihiro Katsura et al.

Summary: This study found that overlapping surgery-related SRs/MAs exhibit high variability in results and methodological quality. High quality SR/MA scores are an independent predictor of more frequent citations. Researchers and journal editors should focus on limiting publications to higher-quality reviews.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study

Claudia Hacke et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

COVID-19 coronavirus research has overall low methodological quality thus far: case in point for chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine

Paul Elias Alexander et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist

Peter Tugwell et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology

Matthew K. Sigurdson et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Methodological quality assessment of network meta-analysis of drug interventions: implications from a systematic review

Fernanda S. Tonin et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Harms From Uninformative Clinical Trials

Deborah A. Zarin et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Meta-analyses in environmental and occupational health

John P. A. Ioannidis

OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Overview of Systematic Reviews of Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Evidence of Publication Overlap

Ioannis Doundoulakis et al.

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Replication, Duplication, and Waste in a Quarter Million Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Konstantinos C. Siontis et al.

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Research waste is still a scandal-an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers

Paul Glasziou et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2018)

添加到收藏夹

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Overlapping network meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies

F. Naudet et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Disorganized Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Time to Systematize the Conduct and Publication of These Study Overviews?

Irbaz Bin Riaz et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)

添加到收藏夹

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed

Penny Whiting et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

添加到收藏夹

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

John P. A. Ioannidis

MILBANK QUARTERLY (2016)

添加到收藏夹

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study

Matthew J. Page et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2016)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Respiratory System

Overlapping meta-analyses of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents: bringing clarity or confusion?

Davide Capodanno

JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE (2016)

添加到收藏夹

Review Orthopedics

Is Local Viscosupplementation Injection Clinically Superior to Other Therapies in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses

Kirk A. Campbell et al.

ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY (2015)

添加到收藏夹

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Surgical Versus Conservative Intervention for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-Analyses

Hao Zhang et al.

MEDICINE (2015)

添加到收藏夹

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Exploring redundant research into the effect of tranexamic acid on surgical bleeding: further analysis of a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Katharine Ker et al.

BMJ OPEN (2015)

添加到收藏夹

Article Endocrinology & Metabolism

Differences in Overlapping Meta-Analyses of Vitamin D Supplements and Falls

Mark J. Bolland et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM (2014)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

A Case Study of Discordant Overlapping Meta-Analyses: Vitamin D Supplements and Fracture

Mark J. Bolland et al.

PLOS ONE (2014)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies

Konstantinos C. Siontis et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence

Iain Chalmers et al.

LANCET (2009)

添加到收藏夹

Review Critical Care Medicine

The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal

Anthony Delaney et al.

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE (2007)

添加到收藏夹

Article Critical Care Medicine

A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature

A Delaney et al.

CRITICAL CARE (2005)

添加到收藏夹

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.