4.6 Review

Increasing FDA-accelerated approval of single-arm trials in oncology (1992 to 2020)

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 159, 期 -, 页码 151-158

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.04.001

关键词

US food and drug administration; Antineoplastic agents; Accelerated approval; Historical controls; Drug approval; Government regulation; Legis-lation; Drug

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to analyze the characteristics of single-arm trials (SAT), evaluate the transparency in presenting historical control by the FDA, and assess confirmatory randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The findings showed that 47% of FDA-AA approvals were based on SAT, with 52% of treatments converting into regular approval and 46% based on confirmatory RCTs using overall survival (OS) as an outcome. Improved transparency in reporting historical controls is necessary.
Objectives: We aimed to map the characteristics of single-arm trials (SAT), report the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) transparency in presenting historical control, and to assess the confirmatory randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Study Design and Setting: This metaresearch included a review of all oncology indication approved using SAT by FDA-AA (FDAd Accelerated Approval) from 1992 to 2020. Two independent reviewers identified SAT, extracted data from FDA full medical reviews for historical controls reported and MEDLINE for searching for confirmatory RCT published. Results: Of 254 FDA-AA approvals, 119 (47%) were approved for oncologic indications using SAT. Fifty-four drugs for 72 oncology indications were for leukemia, lymphoma, lung cancer, urothelial cancer, multiple myeloma, and thyroid cancer. Overall, 37 (52%) treatments were converted into regular approval. Of these, 17 (46%) were based on confirmatory RCTs using overall survival (OS) as an outcome. Five indications were withdrawn from the market. Most trials outcomes were blindly assessed by independent research committees. Median trial sample size was 105 patients (min:8 to max:532). The FDA did not fully specify historical control selection in 75% of cases. Conclusion: The granting of FDA-AAs based on SAT in oncology is increasing with more target drugs approved over time. Transparency in historical control reporting is necessary. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据