4.6 Article

Combined use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker vs. a double-lumen endobronchial tube in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111136

关键词

Bronchial blocker; Double-lumen endobronchial tube; Laryngeal mask airway; Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to test the feasibility and efficacy of using a combination of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker in thoracoscopic surgery to reduce postoperative hoarseness and sore throat. The results of the randomized controlled trial showed that this combination technique did not significantly reduce hoarseness compared to the use of a double-lumen endobronchial tube.
Study objective: The combined use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker may reduce postoperative hoarseness and sore throat. We aimed to test the feasibility and efficacy of this combination technique in thoracoscopic surgery.Design: A single-center, patient-assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial.Setting: Nagoya City University Hospital (between November 2020 and April 2022).Patients: A total of 100 adult patients undergoing lobectomy or segmentectomy by video-or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to either group using a combination of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker (pLMA+BB group) or a double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT group).Measurements: The primary outcome was the hoarseness incidence on 1-3 postoperative days. Secondary out-comes included sore throat, intraoperative complications (hypoxemia, hypercapnia, surgical interruption, malposition of devices, unintended lung expansion, and ventilatory difficulty), lung collapse, device placement -related outcomes, and coughing during emergence.Main results: A total of 100 patients underwent randomization (51 to the pLMA+BB group and 49 to the DLT group). After drop outs, a total of 49 patients in each group were analyzed per-protocol. The incidences of hoarseness in the pLMA+BB and DLT groups were 42.9% and 53.1% (difference,-10.2%; 95% confidence in-terval,-30.1% to 10.3%; p = 0.419), 18.4% vs. 32.7%, and 20.4% vs. 24.5% on postoperative day 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The incidences of sore throat in the pLMA+BB and DLT groups were 16.3% vs. 34.7% (difference,-18.4%; 95% confidence interval,-35.9% to-0.9%; p = 0.063) on postoperative day 1. In the pLMA+BB group, more intraoperative complications and less coughing during emergence were observed compared to the DLT group. Lung collapse and placement-related outcomes were comparable between the groups.Conclusions: The combination of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and bronchial blocker did not significantly reduce hoarseness compared to the double-lumen endobronchial tube.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据