4.7 Article

Nanosilica from Averrhoa bilimbi juice pre-treated rice husk: Preparation and characterization

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 413, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137476

关键词

Averrhoa bilimbi juice; Bioleaching; Nanosilica; Rice husk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a new concept of preparing nanosilica from rice husk without concentrated mineral acids by using a bioleaching strategy to remove metallic impurities. Nanosilica (BJRHS) was prepared by calcinating Averrhoa bilimbi juice pre-treated rice husks. The chemical and atomic structures of commercial precipitated silica (CS), rice husk ash (RHA), and BJRHS were analyzed using different techniques. The results showed that BJRHS had a smaller particle size and a higher BET surface area compared to RHA and CS. Sustainable production of mesoporous nanosilica with excellent surface area and purity from rice husk is recommended for applications in catalysis, polymer technology, etc.
The preparation of nanosilica from rice husk without using any concentrated mineral acids is a novel concept. This work proposes a bioleaching strategy to remove metallic impurities from rice husk for the preparation of nanosilica. Herein, nanosilica (BJRHS) was prepared by calcinating Averrhoa bilimbi juice pre-treated rice husks in a muffle furnace. The chemical and atomic structures of commercial precipitated silica (CS), rice husk ash (RHA), and BJRHS were analyzed using different analytical techniques. The optimal leaching time, calcination temperature, and calcination time were 1 h, 500 degrees C, and 6 h respectively. The particle size of BJRHS was found to be 6-12 nm, which is less than that of RHA and CS. The BET surface area of BJRHS (204 m2/g) was found to be greater than RHA (110.5 m2/g) and CS (172.1 m2/g). Mesoporous nanosilica with excellent surface area and purity was produced sustainably from rice husk which could be recommended to use in the field of catalysis, polymer technology, etc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据