4.5 Article

Chlordecone determination in serum by LC-MS/MS and the importance of low limit of detection

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2023.123915

关键词

Chlordecone; Pesticide; Insecticide; Liquid chromatography; Mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlordecone, an organochlorine insecticide used in French West Indies banana fields, has caused persistent pollution of soils and waters. People are mainly exposed to chlordecone through food and studies have shown that this exposure is associated with various health disorders. A new LC-MS/MS method with a low limit of detection has been developed to measure chlordecone in serum.
Chlordecone is an organochlorine insecticide that has been used intensively from 1973 to 1993 in the French West Indies banana fields to control root borers. This use has resulted in persistent pollution of soils and waters, and people have been and are still exposed mainly through food. Epidemiological studies showed that this exposure is associated with health disorders, including prostate cancer, prematurity, cognitive or motor development. The measurement of chlordecone in serum is considered as the best surrogate, though no clear and definitive cut-off value has been established. This renders necessary the development of analytical methods with the lowest limit of detection as possible. While most published methods have utilized GC-MS or GC-MS/MS, in the present study we report an LC-MS/MS method based on a simple QuEChERS salts extraction. The whole procedure was validated according to ISO 15189 requirements and reached LOD and LOQ values of 0.007 and 0.02 mu g/L, respectively. It was applied to more 10 000 serum samples of French Indies inhabitants. More than a half had a concentration below 0.1 mu g/L and more than one third of them exhibiting a concentration below 0.05 mu g/L. The capability of this LC-MS/MS method to detect very low concentrations highlights its utility in exploring the health impact of chlordecone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据