4.6 Article

Optimization of thermal desorption conditions of stir bar sorptive extraction facilitated by machine learning

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1706, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464244

关键词

Odorants; Stir bar sorptive extraction; Desorption efficiency; Random forest; Prediction and validation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stir bar sorptive extraction is effective for trapping odorants, and this study investigated the relationship between desorption conditions and efficiency for different odorants. Four machine learning models were trained using a dataset of four desorption conditions and physicochemical properties. The Random Forest model performed the best, and its prediction value was validated using a dataset of new odorants.
Stir bar sorptive extraction is an effective technique for trapping odorants, but there are limited studies on the effect of varying thermal desorption conditions on desorption efficiency of odorants. Therefore, we conducted this study to explore the relationship between desorption conditions and desorption efficiency for 18 odorants with diverse physicochemical properties using instrumental analysis and mathematical modeling. We trained four types of machine learning models using a dataset comprising 864 different combinations of four desorption conditions (each three levels) and physicochemical properties. The prediction value of the selected model was validated using a validation dataset of six new odorants. The Random Forest model had the highest performance (R = 0.910). The order of feature importance using this model was as follows: cryo-focusing temperature, molecular weight, log P, boiling point, desorption temperature, desorption time, and helium flow. For testing on new odorants, the correlations between predicted and experimental data for terpene (R = 0.99), alcohol (R = 0.98), ester (R = 0.92), sulfide (R = 0.89), phenol (R = 0.88), and aldehyde (R = 0.61) were determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据