4.5 Article

Solid-liquid equilibrium and dissolution thermodynamic properties of L-isoleucine in binary solvent mixtures

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2023.107035

关键词

L-isoleucine; Solubility; Dissolution thermodynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the solubility of L-isoleucine in three binary solvent mixtures was determined by gravimetric method. The effects of temperature and solvent type on the dissolution process were investigated. The thermodynamic properties of L-isoleucine including enthalpy, entropy, and Gibbs free energy change of dissolution process were calculated and discussed based on the experimental data.
Thermodynamic properties, which play an important role in design and optimization of crystallization processes, are the essential data for the study of crystal nucleation and growth. In this study, the solubility of L-isoleucine were firstly determined by gravimetric method in three binary solvent mixtures including water + (ethanol, acetonitrile or DMSO) in the temperature range of 303.20 K to 338.05 K at atmospheric pressure. The effects of temperatures and solvent types on the dissolution process of L-isoleucine were investigated. It was found that the solubility of L-isoleucine increased dramatically with the increasing of the mole fraction of water in each binary solvent mixture and increased monotonically with the increasing of temperature. To extend the applicability of the solubility data, the experimental solubility data of L-isoleucine were fitted and analyzed using the modified Apelblat equation, the CNIBS/R-K model and the Jouyban-Acree model. Finally, based on the Van't Hoff equation and the experimental solubility data, the apparent dissolution thermodynamic properties of L-isoleu-cine including apparent dissolution enthalpy, apparent dissolution entropy, and apparent Gibbs free energy change of dissolution process were calculated and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据