4.7 Article

First-principles property assessment of hybrid formate perovskites

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 159, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0159526

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we used first-principles density functional theory based simulations to investigate the structural, mechanical, dielectric, piezoelectric, and ferroelectric properties of 29 formate perovskites. We found that these materials exhibit highly anisotropic properties. Furthermore, we proposed and computationally characterized several formate perovskites that have not been reported yet.
Hybrid organic-inorganic formate perovskites, AB(HCOO)(3), are a large family of compounds that exhibit a variety of phase transitions and diverse properties, such as (anti)ferroelectricity, ferroelasticity, (anti)ferromagnetism, and multiferroism. While many properties of these materials have already been characterized, we are not aware of any study that focuses on the comprehensive property assessment of a large number of formate perovskites. A comparison of the properties of materials within the family is challenging due to systematic errors attributed to different techniques or the lack of data. For example, complete piezoelectric, dielectric, and elastic tensors are not available. In this work, we utilize first-principles density functional theory based simulations to overcome these challenges and to report structural, mechanical, dielectric, piezoelectric, and ferroelectric properties of 29 formate perovskites. We find that these materials exhibit elastic stiffness in the range 0.5-127.0 GPa; highly anisotropic linear compressibility, including zero and even negative values; dielectric constants in the range 0.1-102.1; highly anisotropic piezoelectric response with the longitudinal values in the range 1.18-21.12 pC/N; and spontaneous polarizations in the range 0.2-7.8 mu C/cm(2). Furthermore, we propose and computationally characterize a few formate perovskites that have not been reported yet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据