4.7 Article

Kinetic isotope effect study of N-6 methyladenosine chemical demethylation in bicarbonate-activated peroxide system

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 159, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0169285

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of ferrous ammonium sulfate concentration on the kinetic isotope effect (KIE) of a chemical demethylation system, revealing the mechanism and key steps of this process. The results suggest that the initial hydrogen extraction is the rate-limiting step, and a tight transition state structure is observed through the analysis of KIE trends.
N-6 methyladenosine is the most abundant nucleic acid modification in eukaryotes and plays a crucial role in gene regulation. The AlkB family of alpha-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases is responsible for nucleic acid demethylation. Recent studies have discovered that a chemical demethylation system using hydrogen peroxide and ammonium bicarbonate can effectively demethylate nucleic acids. The addition of ferrous ammonium sulfate boosts the oxidation rate by forming a Fenton reagent with hydrogen peroxide. However, the specific mechanism and key steps of this process remain unclear. In this study, we investigate the influence of ferrous ammonium sulfate concentration on the kinetic isotope effect (KIE) of the chemical demethylation system using LC-MS. As the concentration of ferrous ions increases, the observed KIE decreases from 1.377 +/- 0.020 to 1.120 +/- 0.016, indicating a combination of the primary isotope effect and inverse alpha-secondary isotope effect with the ion pairing effect. We propose that the initial hydrogen extraction is the rate-limiting step and observe a tight transition state structure in the formation of the hm6A process through the analysis of KIE trends. The concentration-dependent KIE provides a novel perspective on the mechanism of chemical demethylation and offers a chemical model for enzyme-catalyzed demethylation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据