4.5 Article

ZnUMBA - a live imaging method to detect local barrier breaches

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 136, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.260668

关键词

Tight junctions; Barrier function; Epithelia; Live imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epithelial barrier function is commonly analyzed using transepithelial electrical resistance or traceable macromolecules to measure changes in global barrier function. However, these methods lack sensitivity to detect local or transient barrier breaches and do not reveal the location of barrier leaks. To overcome these limitations, the zinc-based ultrasensitive microscopic barrier assay (ZnUMBA) was previously developed, which allows for detection of local tight junction leaks with high spatiotemporal resolution.
Epithelial barrier function is commonly analyzed using transepithelial electrical resistance, which measures ion flux across a monolayer, or by adding traceable macromolecules and monitoring their passage across the monolayer. Although these methods measure changes in global barrier function, they lack the sensitivity needed to detect local or transient barrier breaches, and they do not reveal the location of barrier leaks. Therefore, we previously developed a method that we named the zinc-based ultrasensitive microscopic barrier assay (ZnUMBA), which overcomes these limitations, allowing for detection of local tight junction leaks with high spatiotemporal resolution. Here, we present expanded applications for ZnUMBA. ZnUMBA can be used in Xenopus embryos to measure the dynamics of barrier restoration and actin accumulation following laser injury. ZnUMBA can also be effectively utilized in developing zebrafish embryos as well as cultured monolayers of Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) II epithelial cells. ZnUMBA is a powerful and flexible method that, with minimal optimization, can be applied to multiple systems to measure dynamic changes in barrier function with spatiotemporal precision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据