4.8 Article

Spatially resolved analysis of CO2 hydrogenation to higher hydrocarbons over alkali-metal promoted well-defined FexOyCz

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 425, 期 -, 页码 286-295

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2023.06.019

关键词

Iron oxides; CO 2 hydrogenation; Mechanism; Fischer-Tropsch; Kinetics; Ferrous oxalate; Alkali metals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to higher (C2+) hydrocarbons were prepared by decomposing iron (II) oxalate dihydrate impregnated with Li, Na, K, Rb or Cs carbonate. The structural characteristics of these catalysts, including the presence and type of promoter, determine their activity and product selectivity. Fe3C favors CH4 formation, while C2+-hydrocarbons are formed over Fe5C2. The rate of C2+-hydrocarbons formation is positively correlated with the rate constant of CO2 dissociation and negatively correlated with the rate of CO2 methanation.
A series of catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to higher (C2+) hydrocarbons were prepared through controlled decomposition of iron (II) oxalate dihydrate impregnated with Li, Na, K, Rb or Cs carbonate. They consist of Fe3O4, Fe5C2, Fe3C and Fe. Their steady-state spatial phase distribution is, however, affected by the presence and the kind of the promoter. These structural characteristics determine catalyst activity and product selectivity. Fe3C seems to favor CH4 formation, while C2+-hydrocarbons are formed over Fe5C2. A positive relationship between the rate of C2+-hydrocarbons formation and the rate constant of dissociation of adsorbed CO2 was established, while an opposite dependence is valid for the rate of CO2 methanation. The rate constant of this reaction increases in the presence of alkali metal and with an increase in its atomic number. Therefore, CH4 is mainly formed over Rb-or Cs-doped catalysts through CO hydrogenation, while CO2 methanation prevails over the remaining catalysts.@2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据