4.6 Article

Investigation of ZIF-8, amine-modified ZIF-8 and polysulfone based mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.54650

关键词

amine modification; biogas upgradation; CO2 separation; mixed matrix membranes; ZIF-8

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the preparation and performance of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) in membrane separation. The amine functionalization of ZIF-8 is explored for enhanced CO2 gas permeation without sacrificing CO2/CH4 selectivity. The experimental results show that the MMMs modified with 10% ZIF-8 demonstrate the highest CO2 permeability, while those modified with 15% NH2-ZIF-8 exhibit the highest CO2/CH4 selectivity.
Membrane separation is one of the techniques used for biogas upgradation. Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) are currently being explored to overcome the trade-off of selectivity-permeability inherent in polymer membranes used for gas separation. A significant challenge associated with MMMs is the poor polymer-metal-organic framework (MOF) filler interfacial compatibility, reducing the selectivity or permeability of gas. To address this issue, the present study focuses on the effect of the amine functionalization of ZIF-8 to enhance the CO2 gas permeation without reducing the CO2/CH4 selectivity. MMMs were fabricated using unmodified ZIF-8 and amine-modified ZIF-8 nanofillers dispersed in polysulfone at 5, 10, and 15 wt% loadings. MMMs were characterized by FTIR, DSC, TGA, and FESEM. X-ray diffraction and FTIR analysis was conducted to verify the amine modification of ZIF-8. Further, the performance of MMMs was tested with pure gasses (CO2 and CH4) and a model mixture of CO2 and CH4. In the mixed gas permeation test, the 10 wt% ZIF-8 MMM exhibited the highest CO2 permeability of 25.4 Barrers, while 15 wt% NH2-ZIF-8 MMM exhibited the highest selectivity of 13.5. Notably, the ZIF-8 MMMs demonstrated a 148% increase in CO2/CH4 selectivity, whereas the NH2-ZIF-8 MMMs exhibited a 155% increase compared to the pure polysulfone membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据