4.6 Article

Time-domain minimum-volume cell photoacoustic of thin semiconductor layer. I. Theory

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 133, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0152519

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper derives a model for the photoacoustic gas-microphone signal recorded in a transmission configuration using a minimum volume cell in the time domain. The model considers the inertial thermal relaxations of both the sample and the gas in the cell using the theory of heat conduction. By introducing an electro-thermal analogy for thin samples and short microphone cavity, characteristic quantities are defined for solving the inverse problem in time-domain photoacoustic. The derived model, which includes thermal relaxation, explains the experimentally observed overshoots, undershoots, and oscillatory approach to steady values in high-resolution time-domain photoacoustic measurements of thin semiconductor membranes, which will be presented in detail in a subsequent paper.
The model of a photoacoustic gas-microphone signal in the time domain recorded in a transmission configuration using a minimum volume cell is derived. This model takes into account the inertial thermal relaxations of both the sample and the gas filling the cell by means of the generalized hyperbolic theory of heat conduction. With the introduction of electro-thermal analogy for the thin sample and short microphone length cavity, characteristic quantities are defined, which can be used in solving the inverse problem in time-domain photoacoustic in both cases, when thermal relaxations are neglected as well as when they are considered. The derived model that includes thermal relaxation explains the experimentally observed occurrence of overshoots and undershoots as well as an oscillatory approach to the steady values of the recorded signal in high-resolution time-domain photoacoustic measurements of thin semiconductor membranes, which will be presented in detail in Paper II of the paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据