4.6 Article

Superelastic-like nonlinear deformation hidden in ferroelectric ceramics

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 134, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0164669

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the deformation behavior and tensile strength of ferroelectric ceramics (PbTiO3) under high mechanical loading are investigated using first-principles calculations. It is found that the ceramics exhibit superelastic-like nonlinear deformation with large critical strain. The displacement of oxygen atoms due to the ferroelectric phase transition is identified as the cause of this unique nonlinear deformation. Additionally, the piezoelectric coefficient of the ceramics is calculated, showing a singular peak at inflection points of the stress-strain curve.
The mechanical response of ferroelectric (piezoelectric) ceramics under high stress conditions has a crucial role from the perspective of engineering applications such as advanced actuator systems. In this study, we perform first-principles calculations to clarify the deformation behavior and (ideal) tensile strength for typical ferroelectric ceramics of PbTiO3 (PTO) under high mechanical loading. We find the superelastic-like nonlinear deformation behavior in ferroelectric PTO. In addition, it has several inflection points and shows a large critical strain compared to the paraelectric phase. We conclude that the unique nonlinear deformation in PTO originates from attributable to the displacement of oxygen atoms due to the ferroelectric phase transition based on analyzing the interatomic distances of each atom and an integrated crystal orbital Hamiltonian population with respect to strain. Furthermore, we also calculate the piezoelectric coefficient for PTO and reveal that it shows the singular peak at inflection points of the stress-strain curve. Unveiling and engineering the hidden superelastic-like deformation in the ferroelectric phase may open promising paradigms for functional piezoelectric devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据