4.4 Article

Comparisons of Rainfall Microphysical Characteristics between the Southeastern Tibetan Plateau and Low-Altitude Areas

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY
卷 62, 期 11, 页码 1591-1609

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-23-0046.1

关键词

Convective clouds; Stratiform clouds; Cloud microphysics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the features of raindrop size distribution on the southeastern Tibetan Plateau and compares them with low-altitude regions. It was found that the raindrop concentration and maximum diameter on the Tibetan Plateau are smaller, with higher falling speeds and more maritime-like convection rainfall.
The low air pressure and density over the Tibetan Plateau may have an impact on the microphysical features of rainfall. Using a two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD), a Micro Rain Radar (MRR), and a microwave radiometer (MWR), the features of the raindrop size distribution (DSD) on the southeastern Tibetan Plateau (SETP) are explored and compared with those in low-altitude regions. The falling speed of raindrops on the SETP is higher than that in low-altitude areas. Under different rainfall-rate categories, the number concentration and the maximum diameter of raindrops on the SETP are smaller than those in low-altitude regions. The convective rainfall on the SETP is more maritime-like because the South Asian summer monsoon brings water vapor from the ocean here. For stratiform and convective rainfall, the SETP has more small-sized raindrops than low-altitude locations. The mass-weighted mean diameters (Dm) on the SETP are the smallest among six sites. The generalized intercept parameter (Nw) of stratiform rainfall is balanced at a low rainfall rate, while that of convective rainfall is balanced at a high rainfall rate. Furthermore, for a given m (the shape parameter of gamma distribution) value, the l (the slope parameter of gamma distribution) value on the SETP is the highest of the six sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据