4.2 Article

Welfare and Management of Civets in Civet Coffee Tourism Plantations

期刊

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2023.2270414

关键词

Civet coffee; five freedoms; Kopi Luwak; Paradoxurus; wildlife trade

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the welfare of civets in civet coffee tourism plantations and wildlife markets in Bali, Indonesia. The findings indicate that welfare standards do not meet Indonesian laws and regulations, and factors such as diet and mobility affect the body condition of civets. None of the civets met all of the five freedoms. Improved enforcement of welfare and trade laws is necessary to enhance the welfare of civets and combat illegal trading. Tourists should be informed about the low welfare standards to make informed choices regarding their support for this industry.
Civet coffee is produced with coffee beans that have passed through the digestive tract of civets which are then processed for drinking. Outlets, known as civet coffee tourism plantations are popular tourist attractions in Bali, Indonesia. These outlets keep caged civets for public viewing and sell civet coffee. We assessed civet welfare in 29 civet coffee tourism plantations to assess husbandry factors, the five freedoms and body condition scores. We also assessed civet welfare in eight wildlife markets where civets are sourced for civet coffee tourism and calculated turnover of civets. We found 99 civets in civet coffee tourism plantations and 136 in markets, where. Annually between 400 and 800 civets are sold. Welfare standards do not meet the Indonesian laws and regulations. Diet, hygiene, presence of water and mobility affected body condition scores and no civet met all of the five freedoms. Enforcement of welfare and trade laws is needed to improve civet welfare, and to curb the illegal civet trade. Tourists frequenting civet coffee tourism plantations should be made aware of the low welfare standards to inform their choice about supporting this industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据