4.7 Article

Effect of fluorine doping on the performance of multi-heteroatom doped carbons (F,N,B-C or F,N,S-C) for microwave absorption

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 960, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170872

关键词

Fluorine-containing multi-heteroatom; doped carbons; Polypyrrole precursor; Microwave absorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heteroatom-doped porous carbon materials with high microwave absorption ability were successfully prepared using a template-free method. The introduction of heteroatoms created defective carbon structures. The F,N,S-C absorber exhibited excellent microwave absorption properties, including an RLmin of -38.0 dB at 13.2 GHz (2.5 mm thickness) and an EAB of 6.3 GHz from 11.7-18 GHz (2.0 mm thickness) with only 9.0 wt% filler.
Heteroatom-doped porous carbon materials offer great promise as microwave absorbers. However, tem-plate-free methods for synthesizing porous carbon materials rich in heteroatoms (N,F,B and S), necessary for tuning impedance matching and optimizing attenuation losses, need to be dicovered. In this article, we report the successful preparation of porous fluorine-doped multi-heteroatom carbons (F,N,B-C and F,N,S-C) by the high-temperature pyrolysis of polypyrrole-based precursors. The introduction of the het-eroatoms created defective carbon structures with high microwave absorption ability. In particular, the F,N,S-C absorber offered an excellent loss capacity, including the RLmin of - 38.0 dB at 13.2 GHz (2.5 mm thickness) and the EAB of 6.3 GHz from 11.7 - 18 GHz (2.0 mm thickness) using a filler amount of only 9.0 wt %. The outstanding microwave absorption properties are the result of the interactions between incoming microwaves and carbon defects/pores, which together provide a moderate conductive loss, good polar-ization relaxation (interfacial polarization and defect/dipole polarization) as well as scattering of micro-waves via reflection. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据