4.7 Article

Enhancement effects of Fe-doped Ni3S2 on efficient electrochemical urea oxidation and mechanism insights

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 965, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171292

关键词

Sulfide; Doping; One-pot; Hydrothermal; Structure modulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fe(EDTA)-Ni3S2 @NF electrode was prepared by hydrothermal method, which can reduce the energy consumption of urea-assisted water splitting for hydrogen production. The addition of EDTA promoted Fe doping in Ni3S2, regulating its morphology and electronic structure. The Fe(EDTA)-Ni3S2 @NF showed excellent urea oxidation activity, with a required potential of 1.363 V (vs. RHE) at 50 mA cm(-2). The electrode's kinetics and DFT calculations revealed limitations in urea oxidation reactions under high current density. The detection of NO2- as the liquid product and a faradaic efficiency of 38% for electrooxidation of CO2NH4 to NO2- were observed on Fe(EDTA)-Ni3S2 @NF. These findings provide valuable insights for urea oxidation in water-energy nexus systems.
The urea oxidation reaction (UOR) can reduce the energy consumption of electrolytic for urea-assisted water splitting to produce hydrogen. Fe(EDTA)-Ni3S2 @NF electrode is prepared by a simple one-step hydrothermal method. The addition of EDTA promotes more Fe atoms doping into Ni3S2. Fe doping regulated the morphology and electronic structure of Ni3S2, and the Fe(EDTA)-Ni3S2 @NF shows excellent UOR activity. The required UOR potentials on Fe(EDTA)-Ni3S2 @NF at 50 mA cm(-2) is 1.363 V (vs. RHE). In addition, the kinetics experiments and DFT calculations of the electrode toward UOR are carried out. It is found that UOR reactions under high current density (760 mA cm(-2)) would be limited. The liquid product of NO2- were detected by ion chromatography for UOR on Fe(EDTA)-Ni3S2 @NF. The faradaic efficiency for the electrooxidation of CO2NH4 to NO2- is 38 %. These findings provide complementary insights for the UOR in water-energy nexus systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据