4.7 Article

Probing deformation behavior of a refractory high-entropy alloy using in situ neutron diffraction

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 971, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172635

关键词

High-entropy alloy; In situ neutron diffraction; Strain-hardening; Planar slip; Deformation behavior

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The grain orientation-dependent lattice strain evolution in a (TiZrHfNb)98N2 alloy during tensile loading was investigated using in situ neutron diffraction. The alloy exhibited a relatively low strain-hardening rate, indicating weak work-hardening ability. Transmission electron microscopy revealed a dislocation planar slip mode confined to a few single-slip planes, leading to in-plane softening due to high pile-up stresses. During plastic deformation, <110>-oriented grains yielded first, followed by lattice relaxation, and then the load transferred to <200>-oriented grains due to plastic anisotropy.
The grain orientation-dependent lattice strain evolution of a (TiZrHfNb)98N2 refractory high-entropy alloy (HEA) during tensile loading has been investigated using in situ neutron diffraction. The equivalent strain-hardening rate of each of the primary -oriented grain families was found to be relatively low, manifesting the macroscopically weak work-hardening ability of such a body-centered cubic (BCC)-structured HEA. This finding, along with the post-mortem transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization, is indicative of a dislocation planar slip mode that is confined in a few single-slip planes and leads to in-plane softening by high pile-up stresses. In particular, during plastic deformation, the <110>-oriented grains yield preferentially, followed by lattice relaxation, while the load transfers to the <200>-oriented grains as a result of plastic anisotropy. Our work provides a new perspective for understanding the strain-hardening behavior and the role of planar slip in the plastic deformation of BCC-structured HEAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据