4.7 Article

Interface engineering toward self-corrosion inhibited alkaline aluminum-air battery via optimized electrolyte system

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 953, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170108

关键词

Aluminum air battery; Self-corrosion; Interface engineering; Ionic liquids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This manuscript proposes an introduced ionic liquids-ethylene glycol-KOH electrolyte system. Theoretical calculations and experiments demonstrate that ionic liquids with stronger hydrophobicity exhibit better corrosion inhibition due to their spontaneous adsorption behavior and water molecule segregation. The imidazole ring cations play a major role in this process. The electrolyte system reconstructs the Al/electrolyte interface, significantly reducing the self-corrosion rate and promoting the uniform dissolution of the Al anode. The proposed electrolyte system shows great potential as an alternative in terms of maintaining Al-6061 anode activity and low corrosion rate levels.
In this manuscript, an introduced ionic liquids-ethylene glycol-KOH electrolyte system is proposed. Theoretical calculations and experiments show that ionic liquids with stronger hydrophobicity provide better corrosion inhibition for their spontaneous adsorption behavior and water molecule segregation. In this process, the imidazole ring cations play a major role. The electrolyte system reconstructs the Al/ electrolyte interface with poor H2O, thus has lower self-corrosion rate for [BMIM]PF6 and contributes to the uniform dissolution of Al anode. Additionally, discharge performance of the full-cell feature same trend, endowing an outstanding capacity of 1971 mAh g-1 and anode utilization of 66.2% in alkaline [BMIM]PF6- ethylene glycol electrolyte. In terms of maintaining the activity of the Al-6061 anode whilst keeping low corrosion rate level, the proposed electrolyte system seems to be potential alternative.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据