4.7 Article

Preparation of anode by MOF pyrolysis enabled long-life rechargeable zinc nickel batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 949, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169870

关键词

Zinc-nickel rechargeable batteries; Zinc anode; MOF pyrolysis; Long -term cyclic stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water-induced parasitic reaction and zinc dendrite growth caused by uneven electric field distribution on the surface of zinc anode are the most controversial problems in practical applications of zinc-nickel rechargeable batteries for large-scale energy storage. In this study, Bi2O3/In2O3 doped ZnO@C synthesized by MOF pyrolysis demonstrated good cycle stability, inhibiting hydrogen evolution and achieving uniform zinc deposition. The Bi2O3 doped ZnO@C (BCZ) and In2O3 doped ZnO@C (ICZ) electrodes delivered high capacity and long-term cyclic stability, providing new ideas for anode synthesis in aqueous rechargeable zinc metal batteries.
Water-induced parasitic reaction and zinc dendrite growth caused by uneven electric field distribution on the surface of the zinc anode are the most controversial problems in the practical application of zinc-nickel rechargeable batteries in large-scale energy storage. Herein, Bi2O3/In2O3 doped ZnO@C synthesized by MOF pyrolysis with good cycle stability. The ability to inhibit hydrogen evolution and achieve uniform deposition of zinc is characterized by CV, Tafel, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Benefiting from the high hydrogen evolution overpotential and high electrical conductivity, Bi2O3 doped ZnO@C (BCZ) and In2O3 doped ZnO@C (ICZ) electrodes deliver high capacity of 640 mA h g-1 and 580 mA h g-1 at 10 C after 1200 and 3400 cycles, respectively, and reveals long-term cyclic stability with capacity retention over 90%. This work provides new ideas for the anode synthesis of aqueous rechargeable zinc metal batteries and other bat-teries. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据