4.7 Article

Effect of surface defect states on Zn(1-x)CdxS for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 955, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170265

关键词

Photocatalytic; Hydrogen; Zn(1-x)CdxS; Solid solution; Defect states

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Zn(1-x)CdxS solid solution with different Zn/Cd molar ratio was synthesized and tested for photocatalytic H2 production from water. The bandgap, charge carrier separation efficiency, and surface defect states of the Zn(1-x)CdxS can be adjusted by altering the Zn/Cd molar ratio. The Zn0.8Cd0.2S exhibited the best performance for photocatalytic H2 production with a H2 production rate of 7.71 mmol center dot g-1 center dot h-1.
Photocatalytic H2 production using solar energy has received great attention, but suffers from low photo -catalytic efficiency. Herein, Zn(1-x)CdxS solid solution with different Zn/Cd molar ratio was synthesized by a solvothermal method, and tested for photocatalytic H2 production from water. The bandgap, charge carrier separation efficiency and surface defect states of the Zn(1-x)CdxS can be adjusted by altering the Zn/Cd molar ratio. The separation efficiency of photogenerated electrons and holes was greatly enhanced with the Zn/Cd molar ratio of 0.8:0.2. Moreover, the Zn0.8Cd0.2S exposed most surface defect states compared to those of other Zn(1-x)CdxS, which can be act as electron pools and active sites for improving photocatalytic H2 production. Therefore, when the molar ratio of Zn/Cd is 0.8:0.2, the Zn0.8Cd0.2S exhibited the best perfor-mance for photocatalytic H2 production with the H2 production rate of 7.71 mmol center dot g-1 center dot h-1, which is much higher than that of ZnS (17 mu mol center dot g-1 center dot h-1) and CdS (5.37 mu mol center dot g-1 center dot h-1). This work provides an in-depth un-derstanding of the surface defect states for enhancing the photocatalytic H2 production.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据