4.7 Article

Inducible Cytochrome P450s in the Fat Body and Malpighian Tubules of the Polyphagous Pests of Spodoptera litura Confer Xenobiotic Tolerance

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c04865

关键词

cytochrome P450; cyantraniliprole; gossypol; Spodoptera litura

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identifies the important roles of cytochrome P450 genes in detoxification of xenobiotics, particularly cyantraniliprole and gossypol, in Spodoptera litura. Several candidate genes were found to confer tolerance to these substances, while knockdown of certain genes increased mortality. Homology modeling and molecular docking analysis indicate the potential of these genes to bind with cyantraniliprole. Overall, this research provides important insights into the detoxification mechanisms and tolerance of S. litura.
Cytochrome P450 plays vital roles in detoxifying xenobiotics. In this study, SlCYP340A and SlCYP340L expression in the Spodoptera litura fat body and SlCYP332A1, SlCYP6AB12, SlCYP6AB58, SlCYP6AB59, and SlCYP6AN4 expression in the Malpighian tubules were significantly upregulated after cyantraniliprole exposure, and SlCYP6AB58 and SlCYP6AB59 expression levels were simultaneously increased in the Malpighian tubules after gossypol treatment. Drosophila ectopically expressing candidate P450 genes showed that SlCYP332A1, SlCYP6AB12, SlCYP6AB59, SlCYP6AN4, and SlCYP340A conferred cyantraniliprole tolerance. The overexpression of SlCYP6AB58 and SlCYP6AB59 in Drosophila increased the number of eggs laid under the gossypol treatment. Moreover, the knockdown of SlCYP332A1, SlCYP6AB12, SlCYP6AB59, SlCYP6AN4, and SlCYP340A increased S. litura mortality under the cyantraniliprole treatment. Homology modeling and molecular docking results suggested that candidate P450 has the potential to bind with cyantraniliprole. These results indicate that the CYP3 and CYP4 genes participate in cyantraniliprole detoxification and that SlCYP6AB59 may be simultaneously involved in the gossypol tolerance of S. litura.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据