4.7 Article

Characterizing and Decoding the Effects of Different Fermentation Levels on Key Aroma Substances of Congou Black Tea by Sensomics

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 71, 期 40, 页码 14706-14719

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c02813

关键词

black teafermentation; key aroma substance; gas chromatography-olfactometry; flavor dilution analysis; reconstruction experiments

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fermentation is crucial for the formation of black tea aroma, and the key aroma components include phenylacetaldehyde, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, and geraniol. The degree of fermentation and the presence of additives contribute to the differences in black tea aroma.
Fermentation is the key technology for black tea aroma formation. The key aroma substances of black tea at different fermentation stages (unfermented (WDY), underfermented (F1H), fully fermented (F4H), and overfermented (F8H)) were characterized by the methodology of Sensomics. Aroma extract dilution analysis was performed on volatile fractions extracted by using solvent-assisted flavor evaporation and solid-phase microextraction, yielding 93 odor-active areas. Internal standard method plus stable isotope dilution analysis was used for quantitative analysis. The omission experiment identified 23 aroma substances. Further reduction and addition experiments revealed phenylacetaldehyde, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, geraniol, linalool, beta-damascenone, 2-methylbutyraldehyde, dimethyl sulfide, and isovaleraldehyde with odor activity values (OAV) > 100 as the characteristic aroma components of F4H and also as the main contributors to aroma differences between different fermentation degrees. The green odor of (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal was highlighted in WDY and F1H relative to that in F4H due to the lower contribution of phenylacetaldehyde and beta-damascenone in the former two samples. Additionally, excessive OAV increase of fatty aldehydes in F8H masked its similar floral and fruity aroma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据