4.7 Article

Crystal Structure of Fungal Nonspecific Phospholipase C Unveils a Distinct Catalytic Mechanism

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 71, 期 43, 页码 16352-16361

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c05155

关键词

nonspecific phospholipase C; fungi; Rasamsoniaemersonii; crystal structure; catalytic mechanism; phospholipid hydrolysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the crystal structure of a fungal NPC derived from Rasamsonia emersonii, revealing its distinguishable features from other known phospholipase C. The structure of the fungal NPC lacks the C-terminal domain (CTD) found in plant NPCs, which is crucial for their activity. Through comparative analysis and mutation studies, a potential molecular mechanism underlying phospholipid hydrolysis in fungal NPCs is proposed. Furthermore, the study sheds light on the evolutionary trajectory of enzymes across diverse species.
Nonspecific phospholipase C (NPC) plays a pivotal role in hydrolyzing phospholipids, releasing diacylglycerol-an essential second messenger. Extensive research has elucidated the structure and function of bacterial and plant NPCs, but our understanding of their fungal counterparts remains limited. Here, we present the first crystal structure of a fungal NPC derived from Rasamsonia emersonii (RePLC), unraveling its distinguishable features divergent from other known phospholipase C. Remarkably, the structure of RePLC contains solely the phosphoesterase domain without the crucial C-terminal domain (CTD) found in plant NPCs, although CTD is important for their activity. Through a comparative analysis of structural features among NPCs from diverse species combined with structure-based mutation analyses and bioinformatics methods, we propose a potential molecular mechanism that may universally underlie the catalysis of phospholipid hydrolysis in fungal NPCs. Furthermore, our study sheds light on the captivating evolutionary trajectory of enzymes across diverse species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据