4.7 Article

Cover Crop Cultivar, Species, and Functional Diversity is Reflected in Variable Root Exudation Composition

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 71, 期 30, 页码 11373-11385

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c02912

关键词

cover crop; root exudate; soyasaponin; molecular networking; sustainable agriculture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cover cropping is a sustainable alternative to traditional crop rotation practices, but the impact of root exudation from different cover crop species and cultivars is still uncertain. This study used non-targeted gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), as well as targeted LC-MS/MS, to analyze the chemical composition of root exudates from 16 commonly used cover crop species and 3 distinct cultivars of hairy vetch. The results showed that root exudation profiles varied across crop species and cultivars, with legumes standing out as a unique group capable of producing diverse secondary metabolites.
Cover cropping has emerged as a sustainable alternativeto traditionalcrop rotational practices, yet the effects of variable root exudationfrom cover crop species and cultivars within species remains unclear.Here, we assess the chemical heterogeneity of root exudates from 16commonly used cover crop species as well as 3 distinct cultivars ofhairy vetch. Plants were grown hydroponically and analyzed via nontargetedgas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-tandemmass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and targeted LC-MS/MS to evaluate patternsin root exudate composition across species and functional plant type.Overall, root exudation profiles are heterogeneous across crop speciesand cultivars. Species within legumes stand out as a unique functionalgroup of plants capable of producing distinct chemical environmentsrich with complex secondary metabolites, such as triterpenoid saponins(soyasaponins), isoflavonoids, and flavonoids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据