4.4 Review

Rationale, current state and opportunities in combining biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis

期刊

JOINT BONE SPINE
卷 90, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2023.105578

关键词

Combination therapy; Biologicals; Cytokine blockade; Rheumatoid arthritis; Psoriatic arthritis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has greatly improved patient outcomes in inflammatory arthritis. However, not all patients achieve remission, and some may have resistance to single cytokine inhibition by bDMARDs. In these cases, the simultaneous or sequential inhibition of multiple cytokines may be considered. Although there have been challenges in the past with combination therapies, advancements in understanding inflammatory pathways and the safety of bDMARDs make new biologic treatment combinations possible. This review discusses the rationale and current evidence for the use of combination bDMARDs in inflammatory arthritis.
The advent of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) has considerably improved patient outcomes in inflammatory arthritis. However, not all patients reach the state of remission, as disease can be resistant even to single cytokine inhibition by bDMARDs. Simultaneous or sequential inhibition of multiple cytokines may be considered in situations where disease control is not adequate under singular inhibition of cytokines. Although there have been some disappointing experiences in the past with combination of bDMARDs, the ongoing improvement of our understanding about inflammatory pathways and the overall better safety understanding of bDMARDs seem to make new biologic treatment combinations possible. This review covers the rationale and current evidence for bDMARDs combination in inflammatory arthritis.& COPY; 2023 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Socie & PRIME;te & PRIME; franc, aise de rhumatologie.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据