4.2 Article

New Randomised Response Models for Two Sensitive Characteristics: Theory and Application

期刊

INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW
卷 91, 期 3, 页码 511-534

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/insr.12555

关键词

estimation of proportions; Pfizer; Moderna; protection of respondents; randomised response technique; relative efficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces two new randomised response models that use a deck of cards to estimate the prevalence and overlap of sensitive characteristics in a population. These models ensure respondent privacy and reduce respondent burden by randomly selecting one card from a deck, each with a pair of sequential questions. The proposed estimators' variance expressions are derived and matched to their Cramer-Rao lower bounds. A simulation study compares the models for least protection, and a real survey application on vaccine acceptability is included, showing cost effectiveness similar to a Harvard Study.
In this paper, we introduce two new randomised response models for estimating the prevalence of two sensitive characteristics and their overlap in a population by making use of a single deck of cards. The proposed models ensure the privacy of the respondents and also reduce the burden on the respondents as they require the random selection of only one card from a deck of cards each of which contains a pair of questions that are to be answered in order. The variance expressions of the proposed estimators are derived and matched to their Cramer-Rao lower bounds of variances. A simulation study has been carried out to compare the proposed models to each other for least protection. Lastly, a real survey application, related to the acceptability of the vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna is included. We had findings in Summer 2021 similar to those of the Harvard Study done in December 2021, which was based on a half-million data values, that shows the cost effectiveness of the survey design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据