4.5 Article

Heading and backing fire behaviours mediate the influence of fuels on wildfire energy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 1244-1261

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/WF22010

关键词

backing fire; burn severity; carbon loss; FBAT; fire effects; flanking fire; forest change; heading fire; Klamath Mountains; Sierra Nevada

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the relative contribution of pre-fire conditions to fire energy and the role of fire advancement direction in fuel consumption. The results showed that pre-fire litter and duff fuels were the most important factors in explaining fire energy, and heading fires consumed more fuel than backing fires. The knowledge of fire energy and fuel consumption among different fire behaviors can inform wildfire management and fuels treatments.
Background. Pre-fire fuels, topography, and weather influence wildfire behaviour and fire driven ecosystem carbon loss. However, the pre-fire characteristics that contribute to fire behaviour and effects are often understudied for wildfires because measurements are difficult to obtain. Aims. This study aimed to investigate the relative contribution of pre-fire conditions to fire energy and the role of fire advancement direction in fuel consumption. Methods. Over 15 years, we measured vegetation and fuels in California mixed-conifer forests within days before and after wildfires, with co-located measurements of active fire behaviour. Key results. Pre-fire litter and duff fuels were the most important factors in explaining fire energy and contributed similarly across severity categories. Consumption was greatest for the forest floor (litter and duff; 56.8 Mg ha(-1)) and 1000-h fuels (36.0 Mg ha(-1)). Heading fires consumed 13.2 Mg ha(-1) more litter (232%) and 24.3 Mg ha(-1) more duff (202%) than backing fires. Remotely sensed fire severity was weakly correlated (R-2 = 0.14) with fuel consumption. Conclusions. 1000-h fuels, litter, and duff were primary drivers of fire energy, and heading fires consumed more fuel than backing fires. Implications. Knowledge of how consumption and fire energy differ among contrasting types of fire behaviours may inform wildfire management and fuels treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据