4.5 Article

Optimum pressure control with three controllable ejectors of a CO2 multi-ejector refrigeration system

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRIGERATION
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 172-185

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2023.10.015

关键词

CO (2) refrigeration; Multi-ejector; Experiment; Controllable ejector; Pressure control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on improving the performance of carbon dioxide refrigeration systems by introducing a multi-ejector design with three controllable ejectors. Experimental analysis shows that the system's performance can be significantly improved by adopting an optimum pressure control strategy under different operating conditions.
The strict regulations on traditional synthetic refrigerants prompted a strong focus on eco-friendly working fluids including carbon dioxide. Nevertheless, a large throttling loss in CO2 refrigeration leads to an inefficient operation. The introduce of ejector allows for recovering part of expansion work and has positive effect on system efficiency, whereas performance deterioration may be found at off-design conditions. In this study, the design of multi-ejector with three controllable ejectors was proposed to improve the system off-design performance. A detailed experimental analysis on the CO2 multi-ejector refrigeration system was investigated. The impact of various operating conditions on multi-ejector performances including pressure lift, entrainment ratio and multiejector efficiency was evaluated. In addition, a comparative study was carried out taking the single-stage compression system with an expansion valve as the baseline. A maximum pressure lift of 656 kPa could be provided. An optimum pressure control (OPC) strategy was proposed and could be used to instruct the practical application in order to maximize the cooling coefficient of performance (COP) at different operating conditions. The cooling COP of multi-ejector system could be improved by 30.69 % by adopting the OPC strategy compared with the baseline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据