4.7 Article

Targeting posterior eye infections with colloidal carriers: The case of Ganciclovir

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123427

关键词

Ocular barrier; Ganciclovir; Nanoparticle; Cytomegalovirus; Vesicle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the use of colloidal carriers to improve the ocular bioavailability of Ganciclovir (GCV) for the treatment of opportunistic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the posterior ocular system. Various formulation strategies and carriers are employed to increase drug permeability and prolong drug residence time in the eye.
The ocular system, unlike any other human body organ, is a system in which foreign bodies appear quite defenceless in front of the eye. Several infections of the ocular system occur due to various opportunistic conditions. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the opportunivores that causes several posterior eye infections. Ganciclovir (GCV),9-(2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethoxymethyl), is aguanine-antiviral agent primarily used to treat CMV diseases. However, the major challenge is of lower bioavailability. Hence, GCV must be dosed repeatedly to enhance drug absorption. but this causes side effects like neutropenia and bone marrow suppression. So, formulators have used alternative formulation strategies such as prodrug formulation and colloidal drug delivery systems. In the prodrug strategy, they attempted to bind various compounds into the parent drug to increase the permeability and bioavailability of GCV. In colloidal drug delivery systems, mucoadhesive microspheres, nanoparticles, Niosome and liposome were employed to extend the drug residence time at the application site. This paper discusses several colloidal carriers combined with GCV to treat opportunistic CMV infection in the posterior ocular system. It reviews the limitations of conventional ocular therapy and explores various novel formulation approaches to improve the ocular bioavailability of GCV in the posterior chamber of the eye.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据