4.7 Review

LOXL2 in Cancer: A Two-Decade Perspective

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241814405

关键词

LOXL2; human tumour sample; regulation; targets; mouse models; tumour progression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lysyl Oxidase Like 2 (LOXL2) is a protein belonging to the lysyl oxidase (LOX) family, and it has been shown to play an important role in multiple cancers. Aberrant expression of LOXL2 is strongly associated with poor prognosis in patients. Additionally, LOXL2 has been found to be associated with various targets affecting tumor progression. The mechanisms underlying the abnormal expression of LOXL2 in tumors involve a complex network of signaling factors.
Lysyl Oxidase Like 2 (LOXL2) belongs to the lysyl oxidase (LOX) family, which comprises five lysine tyrosylquinone (LTQ)-dependent copper amine oxidases in humans. In 2003, LOXL2 was first identified as a promoter of tumour progression and, over the course of two decades, numerous studies have firmly established its involvement in multiple cancers. Extensive research with large cohorts of human tumour samples has demonstrated that dysregulated LOXL2 expression is strongly associated with poor prognosis in patients. Moreover, investigations have revealed the association of LOXL2 with various targets affecting diverse aspects of tumour progression. Additionally, the discovery of a complex network of signalling factors acting at the transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and post-translational levels has provided insights into the mechanisms underlying the aberrant expression of LOXL2 in tumours. Furthermore, the development of genetically modified mouse models with silenced or overexpressed LOXL2 has enabled in-depth exploration of its in vivo role in various cancer models. Given the significant role of LOXL2 in numerous cancers, extensive efforts are underway to identify specific inhibitors that could potentially improve patient prognosis. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of two decades of research on the role of LOXL2 in cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据