4.7 Article

Antiplatelet Effects of Selected Xanthine-Based Adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) Receptor Antagonists Determined in Rat Blood

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713378

关键词

adenosine A(2A); A(2B) receptors; A(2B) receptor antagonists; anti-aggregation effect; antiplatelet activity; phosphodiesterase activity; lipid peroxidation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The platelet aggregation inhibitory activity of selected xanthine-based adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) receptor antagonists was investigated, and the compounds were found to act as moderately potent non-selective inhibitors of phosphodiesterases (PDEs). The highest inhibitory activity against PDE3A was observed in TB-42, along with moderate activity against PDE2A and PDE5A. The antiplatelet activity of the compounds may be due to inhibition of PDEs, leading to increased cAMP and/or cGMP concentrations in platelets.
The platelet aggregation inhibitory activity of selected xanthine-based adenosine A(2A )and A(2B) receptor antagonists was investigated, and attempts were made to explain the observed effects. The selective A(2B) receptor antagonist PSB-603 and the A(2A) receptor antagonist TB-42 inhibited platelet aggregation induced by collagen or ADP. In addition to adenosine receptor blockade, the compounds were found to act as moderately potent non-selective inhibitors of phosphodiesterases (PDEs). TB-42 showed the highest inhibitory activity against PDE3A along with moderate activity against PDE2A and PDE5A. The antiplatelet activity of PSB-603 and TB-42 may be due to inhibition of PDEs, which induces an increase in cAMP and/or cGMP concentrations in platelets. The xanthine-based adenosine receptor antagonists were found to be non-cytotoxic for platelets. Some of the compounds showed anti-oxidative properties reducing lipid peroxidation. These results may provide a basis for the future development of multi-target xanthine derivatives for the treatment of inflammation and atherosclerosis and the prevention of heart infarction and stroke.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据