4.7 Article

Somatosensory-Evoked Early Sharp Waves in the Neonatal Rat Hippocampus

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24108721

关键词

hippocampus; CA1; dentate gyrus; sharp wave; neonatal rat; somatosensory; sensory-evoked response; local field potentials; multiple unit activity; current-source density

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, scientists observed that somatosensory stimulation in newborn rats can evoke similar electrical activity as spontaneous early sharp waves (eSPWs), suggesting that sensory feedback from movements is involved in the association of eSPWs with myoclonic movements in neonatal rats.
The developing entorhinal-hippocampal system is embedded within a large-scale bottom-up network, where spontaneous myoclonic movements, presumably via somatosensory feedback, trigger hippocampal early sharp waves (eSPWs). The hypothesis, that somatosensory feedback links myoclonic movements with eSPWs, implies that direct somatosensory stimulation should also be capable of evoking eSPWs. In this study, we examined hippocampal responses to electrical stimulation of the somatosensory periphery in urethane-anesthetized, immobilized neonatal rat pups using silicone probe recordings. We found that somatosensory stimulation in similar to 33% of the trials evoked local field potential (LFP) and multiple unit activity (MUA) responses identical to spontaneous eSPWs. The somatosensory-evoked eSPWs were delayed from the stimulus, on average, by 188 ms. Both spontaneous and somatosensory-evoked eSPWs (i) had similar amplitude of similar to 0.5 mV and half-duration of similar to 40 ms, (ii) had similar current-source density (CSD) profiles, with current sinks in CA1 strata radiatum, lacunosum-moleculare and DG molecular layer and (iii) were associated with MUA increase in CA1 and DG. Our results indicate that eSPWs can be triggered by direct somatosensory stimulations and support the hypothesis that sensory feedback from movements is involved in the association of eSPWs with myoclonic movements in neonatal rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据