4.7 Article

Improvements in performance and durability through surface modification of aluminum micro-pulsating heat pipe using water as working fluid

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124445

关键词

Pulsating heat pipe; Heat transfer; Surface modification; Superhydrophilic; Two-phase flow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A cheaper and simpler micro-nano surface treatment method was applied to improve the performance and durability of water-Al PHPs by preventing the production of H-2 gas during Al-water reactions. The modified PHP exhibited flow regeneration and a 45.8% lower thermal resistance compared to the original surface PHP.
PHPs (pulsating heat pipes) using water are typically made of Cu and Si. Although Al is more sustainable than Cu and cheaper than Si (in addition to weight and durability advantages), water-Al PHPs have not been extensively investigated because noncondensable H-2 gas is generated during Al-water reactions at high temperatures, stopping the flow in PHPs and degrading the thermal performance. In this study, a nontoxic micro-nano surface treatment method that is cheaper and simpler than the only reported method for water-Al PHPs was applied to the internal surface of an Al PHP. This prevented H-2 gas production by forming Al(OH)(3), thereby eliminating possible reaction sites on the surface. The internal two-phase flows, which significantly affected the thermal performance of PHPs, were compared using a flow visualization technique. The dry-out region gradually expanded in the original PHP with increasing operation time. In contrast, the modified surface PHP exhibited flow regeneration, preventing dry-out, as well as a thermal resistance 45.8% lower than that of the original surface PHP. Further, the critical heat flux of the PHP remained at 4.57 W/cm(2) with the modified surface. Therefore, the proposed method improved the performance and durability of water-Al PHPs. (c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据