4.6 Article

A mathematical programming approach for downscaling multi-layered multi-constraint land-use models

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2023.2241144

关键词

Downscaling; land-use; land-cover; mathematical programming; >

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a downscaling method for land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) models, using a mathematical programming approach to disaggregate multi-layered land-use change projections while respecting a range of constraints. The method is calibrated and validated with MapBiomas data and successfully predicts land-use at a finer resolution. It is also applied to future projections for 2050. This paper advances the state-of-the-art in LULCC modeling by introducing a mathematical programming approach with spatial effects, allowing flexibility in the number and type of layers and constraints.
Land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) models are important tools for environmental policy planning. LULCC models are frequently constrained to the generation of projections at a specific resolution. However, subsequent studies or models may require finer resolutions. In this work, a downscaling method for LULCC models is proposed that uses a mathematical programming approach to disaggregate the multiple layers of the land-use change projections while respecting a series of constraints. The method is calibrated and validated with MapBiomas data for the years 2000 and 2018 converted for the GLOBIOM-Brazil model, successfully predicting land-use at a finer resolution. Also, as proof of concept, the calibrated model is also applied for GLOBIOM-Brazil projections for 2050. This paper advances the state-of-the-art by proposing and testing a downscaling method using a mathematical programming approach with spatial effects, that operates on multi-layered land-use projections with a range of constraints while allowing flexibility on the number and type of the specific layers and constraints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据