4.7 Article

Fatigue tests and fatigue-life prediction models for hybrid welded-bolted demountable shear connectors

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107826

关键词

Demountable shear connector; Push out test; Shear strength; Fatigue life; Stiffness degradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four push out tests were conducted to assess the structural performance of a welded demountable shear connector (WDSC) under high-cycle fatigue loading. The primary failure mode observed was stud fracture at the base. The presence of grout inside the tube significantly increased the WDSC's fatigue life by 5.4 times. The study also analysed stiffness degradation and relative slip evolution during fatigue cycles. Two finite element-based approaches were employed for fatigue life prediction: the critical plane method for fatigue crack initiation life and fracture mechanics for crack propagation life. Based on the experimental and numerical results, fatigue life prediction formulas (Wo & BULL;hler curves) are proposed for WDSCs with and without grout to aid in predicting fatigue failure in fatigue-sensitive structural designs.
Four push out tests were conducted to assess the structural performance of a welded demountable shear connector (WDSC) under high-cycle fatigue loading. The primary failure mode observed was stud fracture at the base. The presence of grout inside the tube significantly increased the WDSC's fatigue life by 5.4 times. The study also analysed stiffness degradation and relative slip evolution during fatigue cycles. Two finite element-based approaches were employed for fatigue life prediction: the critical plane method for fatigue crack initiation life and fracture mechanics for crack propagation life. Based on the experimental and numerical results, fatigue life prediction formulas (Wo & BULL;hler curves) are proposed for WDSCs with and without grout to aid in predicting fatigue failure in fatigue-sensitive structural designs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据