4.7 Article

Ecological health analysis of wetlands in the middle reaches of Yangtze River under changing environment

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 3125-3144

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2023.2244471

关键词

Remote sensing; machine learning; ecological prediction; ecological change; Yangtze River basin; >

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changes in wetland ecosystems in the middle Yangtze River basin were studied from 2001 to 2020. The study used a land use simulation model and a random forest method to predict and analyze future wetland changes under different scenarios. Results showed a decrease in overall wetland area, successful simulation of future ecological quality, and reductions in ecological index in certain regions. The study provides a basis for future regional ecosystem quality studies and supports wetland conservation and management.
Changes in wetland ecosystems have a critical impact on the local ecology and species diversity. Different development scenarios and policies are key factors influencing their changes. Therefore, we studied changes of wetlands in the middle Yangtze River basin (MYRB) in 2001-2020, and a patch-generated land use simulation (PLUS) model and random forest (RF) method were applied to predict and analyze the changes under different scenarios in the MYRB in the future (i.e.2035-2095). The results indicated that: (1) The regions with high wetland proportions were concentrated in the central and eastern MYRB in 2001-2020, with a 1.5% decrease in overall wetland area; (2) The RF could simulate the future ecological quality with training and testing accuracies of 0.98 and 0.92, respectively; (3) Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) less than 0.5 in the central and eastern regions and 13.3% reduction in the northwest in the SSP245 scenario. In general, the study provides a basis for future regional studies of ecosystem quality and provides data to support wetland conservation and management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据