4.7 Article

Simultaneous enhanced oil recovery, CCUS and UHUS in shale oil reservoirs

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2023.104301

关键词

CCUS and UHUS; Huff and puff(H & P) gas injection; Net zero emissions; Shale reservoirs; Geologic containment; CO2 andH2 utilization and underground; storage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this paper is to discuss the utilization and storage of CO2 and H2, as well as the application of huff and puff (H&P) gas injection for increased oil recovery. The study focuses on underground hydrogen utilization and storage (UHUS) in shale oil reservoirs and its potential contribution to achieving net zero emissions. The results show that H&P gas injection can significantly enhance oil recovery, with the possibility of application in other shale reservoirs as well, thanks to geologic containment.
The objective of this paper is to put forward some ideas related to CO2 and H2 utilization and storage while simultaneously conducting huff and puff (H & P) gas injection to increase oil recovery. The discussed utilization (U) and storage (S) are important parts of carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS). However, the CO2 capture (C) is beyond the scope of this study. Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) has been studied in the past. However, this is the first paper that investigates the possibility of H & P H2 injection in shale oil reservoirs. Hence, for simplicity we are introducing the acronym UHUS to signify underground hydrogen utilization and storage. It is anticipated that the simultaneous underground utilization and storage of CO2 and H2 will contribute to achieving the goal of net zero emissions.The paper involves the analysis of a real H & P CH4 injection pilot well in the Eagle Ford shale of Texas. The procedure includes history matching the primary and H & P history of the pilot well, and then forecasting oil recovery if the H & P is continued with CH4, or if the H & P is switched to CO2 or H2 in the reservoir simulator. The success of this method relies on geologic containment, which occurs when significant hydrocarbon volumes remain over geologic time in the same general location where they were generated. The Eagle Ford shale ex-emplifies this phenomenon, with hydrocarbons showing an inverted distribution -oil at the top, condensate in the middle, and dry gas at the bottom of the structure. Geologic containment enables the implementation of H & P CH4, CO2 or H2 injection and simultaneous storage of any of the injection fluids in the shale reservoir with negligible risk of unwanted leakage.The results demonstrate that H & P CH4, CO2 or H2 gas injection can considerably boost oil recovery to 25-30% of the original oil in place (OOIP), depending on the injected gas, as compared to only 5-10% with primary recovery methods. The advantages of H & P gas injection described in this paper also have potential application in other shale reservoirs with an inverted distribution of oil, condensate and dry gas, such as the Duvernay shale in Canada, the La Luna shale in Colombia and Venezuela and the Vaca Muerta shale in Argentina. Geologic containment ensures safe and appropriate storage of CO2 and H2 with negligible possibilities of leakage at the conclusion of the H & P project. Additionally, this paper also supports a previous conclusion by Olusola et al. (2021) indicating that gas injection at higher rates for shorter durations of time (as opposed to smaller gas in-jection rates for longer periods of time) can result in substantial improvements in oil recovery. This finding holds true for CH4, CO2 and H2 injection.The novelty of this research is demonstrating the effectiveness of combining H & P CO2 or H2 injection with the underground storage of such fluids in shale reservoirs characterized by geologic containment. This combination provides a win-win situation, as it not only enhances oil recoveries significantly, but also allows for safe storage of CO2 and H2 with negligible possibilities of potential leaks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据