4.7 Article

Magnetic porous carbon derived from a zinc-cobalt metal-organic framework: A adsorbent for magnetic solid phase extraction of flunitrazepam

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 183, 期 11, 页码 3009-3017

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-016-1948-7

关键词

Bimetallic metal-organic framework; Porous material; Magnetic solid phase extraction; Mass spectrometry; Transmission electron microscopy; Scanning electron microscopy; Adsorption-desorption isotherms; Vibrating sample magnetometry; Tea analysis; Ginger ale analysis

资金

  1. Program of Study Abroad for Young Teachers by Agricultural University of Hebei
  2. NSF [CHE-1149367]
  3. NSF IDBR [CHE-1455554]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471643, 31671930]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2016204136]
  6. Scientific and Technological Research Foundation of the Department of Education of Hebei Province [ZD2016085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoporous carbon that contains magnetic cobalt nanoparticles (Co-NPC) was fabricated by direct carbonization of a Zn-Co bimetallic zeolitic imidazolate framework. After carbonization, the magnetic Co-NPs are well dispersed in the porous carbon matrix, with the result that the Co-NPC displays strong magnetism. The Co-NPC possesses a high specific surface area, large pore volumes and a microstructure comprised of mesopores and macropores. This results in fast molecular diffusion of the analytes along with excellent adsorption. The Co-NPC was used as a magnetic adsorbent for the enrichment of the benzodiazepine drug flunitrazepam (rohypnol) from tea and Ginger ale prior to high-resolution mass spectrometric analysis. The calibration plot is linear (with a correlation coefficient of > 0.9869) in the 1 to 500 ng mL(-1) concentration range. The limits of detection are 0.2 ng mL(-1) for Ginger ale and 1.0 ngmL(-1) for Arizona Tea samples, respectively, which is lower by about 4 orders of magnitude than those reported in the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据