4.7 Article

Ascorbic acid-loaded gellan-g-poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate matrix as a wound-healing material

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126243

关键词

Gellan gum; Wound healing; Ascorbic acid; Poly (ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA); Wound care matrix

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new hydrogel system delivering ascorbic acid to wounds was developed using gellan-grafted poly (ethylene glycol) methacrylate. The hydrogel matrix allowed sustained release of ascorbic acid and showed improved wound closure in vitro. The study indicates that ascorbic acid has a favorable impact on wound healing and the GPMA matrix is a promising material for wound healing applications.
Ascorbic acid (AA) is one of the important biomolecules involved in all phases of wound healing. The aim of this study was to develop a new hydrogel system that offers topical delivery of ascorbic acid to wounds during wound care management. In this work, we grafted poly (ethylene glycol) methacrylate onto a renewable biopolymer gellan, and the graft copolymer (GPMA) formed was crosslinked covalently and ionically, and used as a matrix for delivering AA to the wounds. By the processes of grafting and crosslinking, the mechanical properties of the gellan increased several fold compared to mechanically weak native gellan. In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation showed that GPMA was non-cytotoxic to fibroblast cells. GPMA hydrogel matrix allowed the sustained release of AA. When AA was incorporated in GPMA, a significant improvement in wound closure was observed in scratch wound assay performed with keratinocytes. Since AA acts as a cofactor in collagen synthesis, the controlled delivery of AA to the wound microenvironment favors the up-regulation of col & alpha;1 gene expression. This study revealed that ascorbic acid, at a concentration of 150 & mu;M, has a favorable impact on wound healing when tested in vitro. Overall results indicate that the GPMA matrix could be a promising material for wound healing applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据