4.7 Review

Exploring polysaccharide and protein-enriched decellularized matrix scaffolds for tendon and ligament repair: A review

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127891

关键词

Tissue engineering; Decellularized matrix; Tendon/ligament repair

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue engineering has emerged as a primary research topic for treating diseased or damaged tendon/ligament tissue, and decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) scaffolds show promise for restoring tissue function.
Tissue engineering (TE) has become a primary research topic for the treatment of diseased or damaged tendon/ ligament (T/L) tissue. T/L injuries pose a severe clinical burden worldwide, necessitating the development of effective strategies for T/L repair and tissue regeneration. TE has emerged as a promising strategy for restoring T/L function using decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM)-based scaffolds. dECM scaffolds have gained significant prominence because of their native structure, relatively high bioactivity, low immunogenicity, and ability to function as scaffolds for cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation, which are difficult to imitate using synthetic materials. Here, we review the recent advances and possible future prospects for the advancement of dECM scaffolds for T/L tissue regeneration. We focus on crucial scaffold properties and functions, as well as various engineering strategies employed for biomaterial design in T/L regeneration. dECM provides both the physical and mechanical microenvironments required by cells to survive and proliferate. Various decellularization methods and sources of allogeneic and xenogeneic dECM in T/L repair and regeneration are critically discussed. Additionally, dECM hydrogels, bio-inks in 3D bioprinting, and nanofibers are briefly explored. Understanding the opportunities and challenges associated with dECM-based scaffold development is crucial for advancing T/L repairs in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据