4.7 Article

Magnetic carbon nitride nanocomposites as enhanced peroxidase mimetics for use in colorimetric bioassays, and their application to the determination of H2O2 and glucose

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 183, 期 12, 页码 3191-3199

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-016-1972-7

关键词

Magnetic nanocomposites; Enzyme mimetic; Hydrogen peroxide; Glucose; Transmission electron microscopy; X-ray diffraction; Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; X-ray photoelectron spectra; Magnetization hysteresis loops

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21405163]
  2. Foundation for Sci&Tech Research Project of Gansu Province [145RJYA271]
  3. Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists of Gansu [1506RJDA281]
  4. top priority program of One-Three-Five Strategic Planning of Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, CAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphite-like carbon nitride - Fe3O4 magnetic nanocomposites were synthesized by a chemical co-precipitation method. The nanocomposites were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, FTIR spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and magnetization hysteresis loops. The nanocomposites exhibit enhanced peroxidase-like activity (compared to that of graphite-like carbon nitride or Fe3O4 NPs). More specifically, they are capable of catalyzing the oxidation of different peroxidase substrates (such as TMB, ABTS or OPD) by H2O2 to produce the typical color reactions (blue, green or orange). The nanocomposites retain their magnetic properties and can be separated by an external magnet. On the basis of these findings, a highly sensitive and selective method was applied to the determination of H2O2 and glucose (by using glucose oxidase). It was successfully applied to the determination of glucose in (spiked) human serum. Compared to other nanomaterial-based peroxidase mimetics, the one described here provides distinctly higher sensitivity for both H2O2 and glucose, with detection limits as low as 0.3 mu M and 0.25 mu M, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据