4.7 Article

A microfluidic chip based on an ITO support modified with Ag-Au nanocomposites for SERS based determination of melamine

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 184, 期 1, 页码 279-287

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-016-1990-5

关键词

Silver-gold nanomaterial; PDMS; SERS substrate; Milk analysis; Electrodeposition; Galvanic replacement

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21375156]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Projects) [2015AA021104, 2015AA021107]
  3. Frontier Research Key Projects of Chongqing Science and Technology Committee [cstc2015jcyjBX0010]
  4. Scientific and Technical Innovation Projects for People's Livelihood of Chongqing Science and Technology Committee [cstc2015shms zx0014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes a microfluidic SERS chip-based rapid and high-throughput method for the determination of chemical and biological analytes, specifically of melamine. The chip consists of an indium tin oxide (ITO) glass plate modified with silver-gold nanocomposites (Ag-Au NCs) and a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) cover plate. The chip has five parallel microfluidic channels. The ITO glass provides electrical conductivity and has a smooth surface which makes it well suited for the deposition of the Ag-Au NC by electrodeposition and galvanic replacement. This technique allows good control of the morphology and composition of the composite. Under optimized conditions, the microfluidic SERS chip provides excellent sensitivity for 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA). The detection limit is 0.1 nM and the SERS enhancement factor is 2.7x10(10). The chip exhibits good stability over time and good reproducibility, with a RSD of 8.6 % between the 5 micro-channels. The chip was successfully applied to the determination of melamine in milk with a 10 nM detection limit and an analytical range from 10 nM to 0.1 mM. It is demonstrated that the microfluidic SERS chip developed here shows great promise for use in biochemical assays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据