4.5 Article

Net-shaping of advanced ceramic composites by gelcasting into precision molds made by rapid-prototyping

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijac.14568

关键词

ceramic composites; gelcasting; mechanical properties; microstructure; rapid prototyping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dense ceramic components of complex shapes can be fabricated using the RPGC process, which combines rapid prototyping and gelcasting techniques. EPS molds have advantages in easy demolding and near-net shaping, and result in components with uniform density and good mechanical properties.
Dense ceramic components of complex shapes are fabricated by combining the techniques of rapid prototyping and gelcasting (RPGC process). Free-flowing slurries of ceramic powders are set into precision molds fabricated out of expanded polystyrene (EPS) from computer-aided design files, employing subtractive manufacturing. The removal of the mold from gelled parts is often a serious problem when attempting to produce large and complex-shaped products. The EPS molds have advantages over the commonly used acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) molds in this context. Process innovations led to easy demolding and near-net shaping of components of large and complex geometries that required minimal machining. Fabrication of complex-shaped products out of alumina with a density of 99%, flexural strength of 389 MPa, and fracture toughness of similar to 3 MPa root m is demonstrated. The RPGC process is extended to fabricate composites of alumina and yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) with alpha-alumina platelet inclusions, with enhanced fracture toughness. The components have exhibited uniform density across the body of large and complex-shaped parts, uniform microstructures, and good mechanical properties. EPS molds are also cost effective for fabricating large parts. The process is generic, allows for easy design modifications to include corrections for shrinkage, and also enables uniform distribution of second phases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据