4.6 Article

Novel cross wedge rolling method for producing railcar axles

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-023-12142-1

关键词

Cross wedge rolling; Railcar axle; FEM; Load

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Railcar axles are large-size parts manufactured using forging methods, and more efficient manufacturing methods are being sought. Cross wedge rolling (CWR) is a promising line of research in this respect. However, there are currently no rolling mills capable of manufacturing such large-size parts. By taking advantage of the symmetric shape of a railcar axle, simulations were made to demonstrate the effectiveness of a proposed rolling process, and the high quality of railcar axles produced under industrial conditions confirmed the effectiveness of the developed CWR method.
Railcar axles are large-size parts manufactured in large batches using forging methods. More efficient methods of manufacturing railcar axles are currently being sought. A promising line of research in this respect is connected with the use of cross wedge rolling (CWR). Nonetheless, there exist no rolling mills that would make it possible to manufacture such large-size parts as railcar axles. A solution to this problem was inspired by the symmetric shape of a railcar axle, which makes it possible to roll this part in two passes using the same tools. Taking advantage of the potential offered by numerical modelling, simulations were made of two rolling processes for producing a railcar axle type BA302, i.e. one process was conducted with the use of two rolls and the other with two flat tools moving in the opposite directions. Numerical results demonstrated that railcar axles produced by the proposed rolling process had neither external nor internal (cracks) defects. The effectiveness of the developed CWR method was ultimately confirmed by the high quality of railcar axles that were produced (in a scale of 1:5) under industrial conditions at the Lublin University of Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据