4.7 Article

Electrochemiluminescent detection of Hg(II) by exploiting the differences in the adsorption of free T-rich oligomers and Hg(II) loaded T-rich oligomers on silica nanoparticles doped with Ru(bpy)32+

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 183, 期 7, 页码 2345-2351

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-016-1875-7

关键词

Hg(II) binding DNA probe; Nanomaterials; Chitosan; Carbon nanotubes; Microemulsion; Tetraethylorthosilicate; Transmission electron microscopy; Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; Circular dichroism; T-Hg-T duplex

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21375085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The detection scheme for Hg(II) ions described here is based on the finding that nanoparticles (NPs) prepared from silica and chitosan, and doped with the ruthenium(II) bipyridyl complex [Ru(bpy)(3)(2+)] display large differences in their affinity for T-rich oligomers and Hg(II)-loaded T-rich oligomers. The effect was exploited to design a sensitive electrochemiluminescence (ECL) based assay for Hg(II). In the absence of Hg(II), the oligomers (with 40 bases) strongly bind to the surface of the NPs. Such oligomer-loaded NPs do not bind to a glass carbon electrode (GCE) modified with carbon nanotubes (CNT) in a nafion host matrix. If, however, Hg(II) is present, it will cause the formation of Hg(II)-loaded double-stranded oligomers via T-Hg-T duplexes which are not easily adsorbed on the doped silica NPs. Such NPs are readily assembled on the GCE and this will result in strong ECL. The increase in ECL intensity is a viable parameter for detection of Hg(II) with a detection limit as low as 0.3 pM. Such as sensitivity has not been accomplished in previously reported ECL based methods for detecting Hg(II). In our perception, the method based on differential adsorption presented here is not limited to the detection of Hg(II) but represents a method of wider scope in that other analytes may be detected by this method if respective oligomer probes are available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据