4.7 Article

High-fat diet alters immune cells in spleen, kidney and tumor and impacts the volume growth of renal cell carcinoma

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110982

关键词

T cell; B cell; NK cell; NK cell phenotype; High-fat diet; Renal cell carcinoma; BALB/c-nude

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the effect of high-fat diet on the development of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and the changes in immune cell groups. The findings reveal that high-fat diet impacts tumor growth and alters the frequencies of T cells, B cells, and NK cells. These findings provide new insights for immunotherapy in individuals with obese RCC.
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is strongly associated with abnormal or excessive fat deposition in the body, whose processes include persistent adipose inflammation and other disturbances with the development and function of immune cells. Researchers have recently become more and more interested in understanding how high-fat diet (HFD) affects the development and course of RCC by causing immunological dysfunction. Consequently, we explore the effect of HFD on the changes of immune cell groups in spleens, normal kidneys and tumors, mainly revealing the changes of T cells, B cells and NK cells, and further preliminarily exploring the changes of NK cell phenotype. Our findings demonstrate that: (1) HFD impacts the volume growth of ACHN tumor; (2) HFD increases the frequency of CD3+ T cell in spleen, normal kidney, and in tumor, while there are no significant change in CD19+ B cell in spleen, normal kidney and tumor; (3) HFD increases the frequency of NKp46+ NK cell in tumor, while HFD decrease the frequency of NKp46+ NK cell in spleen; (4) HFD increases the frequency of cNK in spleen, normal kidney and tumor, while HFD decreases the frequency of ILC1 in spleen, normal kidney and tumor. These data will open up new avenues for immunotherapy in individuals with obese renal cell carcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据