4.7 Article

Determination of Pb and Cr in sunscreen samples by high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry and direct analysis

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 89-94

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2016.03.020

关键词

Sunscreen; Direct analysis; Lead; Chromium; HR-CS DS-GF AAS

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES, Brazil)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq, Brazil)
  3. CNPq [151455/2014-7, 161819/2015-0, 305134/2011-6]
  4. CAPES [28704]
  5. UFRGS [26546]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method has been developed for the determination of Cr and Pb in sunscreen samples by high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry and direct analysis (HR-CS DS-GF AAS). Eleven commercial samples of different brands and different factors of sun protection sunscreen were analysed. For optimisation of the furnace temperature programme, pyrolysis and atomisation curves with M1 sunscreen sample were performed using a chemical modifier (0.05% Pd + 0.03% Mg + 0.05% Triton X-100) for Pb and without a modifier for Cr. The figures of merit obtained were: characteristic mass of 10 pg and 2.5 pg and limit of detection (LOD) of 3.0 mu g kg(-1) and 1.0 mu g kg(-1) for Pb and Cr, respectively, based on a sample mass of 4.5 mg. Relative standard deviation (RSD) values were lower than 9%, which are acceptable for direct analysis. For assessment of the accuracy of the method, sunscreen samples were digested. The results, obtained with direct determination of Pb and Cr in sunscreen samples and with acid digestion were statistically accordant, using the calibration with aqueous standards, showing that this calibration method is suitable for this application. The method developed for the analysis of sunscreen samples is accurate, simple, fast and suitable for routine application. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据